IS IT GIVEN LUBINDA ALONE?

By Gershom Ndhlovu

 

In last week’s column, I wrote that Kabwata MP Given Lubinda and other MPs were not solely responsible for the development of their constituencies, but the local authorities under which those areas fell as well as the central government. This was after Kabwata residents demonstrated against the MP and a Non-Governmental Organisation, Forum for Leadership called for Lubinda and other MPs perceived not to be “delivering” to step aside.

I wrote: “I wonder if (Edwin) Lifwekelo implies that MPs should take over the overall development of their constituencies particularly with the K400 million Constituency Development Funds (CDFs) while local authorities and government go to sleep. MPs and councillors can only serve as a conveyor belt for development ideas while local authorities do the rest.”

I received the following response from Mr Justine Mwiinga, a resident of Kamwala South:

“Dear Gershom, whilst I totally agree with you on Magande’s letter to Minister of Transport & Communication, please note that we the residents of Kamwala South do not appreciate your comments on Lubinda. Lubinda and yourselves must not underestimate that demonstration though it may be viewed politically as an MMD affair.

If what Lubinda childishly says those are MMD cadres let him know some of us are not cadres in any way but share the same concerns and are appalled to see the road networks for Kamwala South, Kasama road and Chalala in a deplorable state. Whether you try to justify or not the role of an area MP must be to influence or aid development in his constituency by urging, demanding and criticizing so that together with local residents can see the need especially where wants and needs are many everywhere, as residents we are not privileged to have platform and legislative power to influence government to bring development to the area.

He is also supposed to creatively and proactively liaise with possible local and foreign investors that can help bring development through construction of roads, clinics and other business activities.  It is his role also to work with residents through mobilization of residents to contribute in a formal way and create confidence in community generated and driven projects not just using CDF to tackle floods reactively. All this indirectly and directly an MP should engage government and community to raise the level of life.

Take note that our MP has been speaking in the press print and radio on a number of issues that are general by condemning the president, MMD and other opposition on behalf of his party but what has he done for us to measure his performance since 2001. Rarely has he been pressuring government regarding our problem, which I thought should have been his pre-occupation than trading [sic] more on party lines.

I know his answer will be I have been doing this and we do not need to hear him say it, I feel this is disrespectful to voters. We feel our representation has been mutilated and he needs to address this or else if his thinking is that only government should think on its own without seriously intervening as area MP then he is a mistake to us.

Gershom, try and visit Kamwala South, you will see that the roads are now impassable, then you will appreciate his role, government and our role together to solve this problem. Advise him properly, some people can take mileage in such situation but he should not politic instead we need solutions in Kamwala South than denying that it is not my role to bring development. It is his role to influence development activities as our representative. We are fed up with such lip service.”

If, according to Kabwata residents in general, Lubinda has failed them, I shudder to think what success the other 149 elected MPs have scored in their constituencies with the eight nominated members of parliament together with the president in terms of development.

I have been fortunate enough to visit all the nine provinces of Zambia and most of its 72 districts. I have been to the most urbanized province, the Copperbelt to the least developed North-Western Province (before the new investments that are transforming the area, if at all).

I have seen the least developed areas of the Copperbelt and I have seen metropolitan Solwezi, if we may call it that. I wonder what Lubinda has not done in Kabwata what Benny Tetamashimba has done in Solwezi Central as MP not to attract the ire of the constituents.

As Kabwata residents call for Lubinda’s blood, it is just imperative that Zambians in general start questioning their representatives, from Lubinda through to President Banda, on what they have done for them and, most importantly, what they have not.

If Kabwata residents who literary have access to a lot of amenities can complain against their MP, what about Kaoma and Lukulu residents who have to go through hell on the Dark Forest road to get to Watopa Pontoon on the border between Western and North-western provinces? Would the MPs between Chipata and Lundazi survive for the bad road that people have to endure between the two districts taking more than six hours to navigate the 176 km road?

Who is answerable for the whole lot of boys and girls who fail to go beyond Grade Nine for lack of school places all over the country? Who is equally answerable for those that cannot proceed to tertiary level education when they complete their Grade 12? Woe betide those that cannot find jobs after attaining their degrees, diplomas and post-secondary school certificates as there is no single MP they can point their fingers at for their plight.

Zambians need to discard the culture of being hired at election time and other political junctures for the price of partisan-branded T-shirts, chitenge materials, caps and packets of shake-shake and a few thousands of Kwacha for a few days at the expense of the next five years.

I sympathise with Mr Mwiinga for his genuine concerns, but a number of the people that took part in the demonstration against Lubinda probably just wanted to settle political scores against the opposition MP for his outspokenness against the ruling MMD.

MAGANDE’S ZAMBIAN AIRWAYS LETTER

By Gershom Ndhlovu

 

If the letter purportedly written by former minister of finance Ng’andu Magande wrote to transport and communications minister Dora Siliya about bailing out Zambian Airways which has since suspended operations published on the internet a few days ago is genuine, there is nothing wrong with it, at least on face value.

In the letter, reference number MFAL/102/ dated 26^th June 2008, Magande is purported to have stated:

“By the company asking the National Airport Corporation for deferment of some charges, the company is indirectly asking for assistance from the Government so that it can go through this turbulent period and be able to survive. If the condition in the industry was normal, Zambian Airways could have easily borrowed and could be able to address its cash flow problem. However, investors or lenders usually wait and see for this period to be over before they can think of putting more money in the company. Hence the company has difficulties in finding this extra finance and its survival is very much threatened….

“By preserving Zambian Airways, the Government will actually be reinforcing the Zambian economic empowerment policy. In fact the government has, on a number of occasions repeatedly said the Zambian economy will be private sector led or driven and it will be disastrous to see private sector companies fold without rendering any assistance especially during crisis time.

“Zambian Airways is not asking for a grant but a deferment and NACL (National Airports Corporation Limited) will eventually get the money back. Ultimately, Zambian Airways will be assisted and will eventually grow, employment will be preserved, its contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will be sustained and investors’ confidence will be maintained.”

Even though it is difficult to prove the letter’s authenticity, it is difficult to see any underhand motive, if any, with Magande as finance minister then trying to help the troubled airline which is clear in the above paragraph. I am sure that at the time the letter was written, nobody knew the immediate political future of the country in terms of change of leadership which followed the death of President Levy Mwanawasa a few weeks later.

The rest, as they say, is history. The then Vice President Rupiah Banda contested the republican presidency and was challenged, among others, by Magande who lost and was eventually dropped from Cabinet and now risks being expelled from the MMD where cadres are calling for his blood because of his role in the Zambian Airways saga.

Equally unfortunate is that the people who tended to support Magande’s candidature for presidency are being hounded out of the ruling MMD of whom two MPs, Jonas Shakafuswa and Lameck Chibombamilimo were dropped as deputy ministers and expelled from the party and have since taken the matter to court.

Obviously, the nation is awaiting with baited breath, documents that President Banda has regarding what interest Magande had in the Zambian Airways financing issues but if those documents include this letter, or is the only document that is the evidence of “malpractice” by the former minister, really there is no need to waste time and money on this matter.

There is no hint in the letter on the cancelling of the debt that the airline owes or owed NACL and other companies particularly in return for favours. Rather, there is emphasis on the deferment of the debt for a given period of time.

I am sure that in business, but particularly in troubled global economic times like this when other governments are helping industry affected by the meltdown, this is a normal practice.

I am not defending Magande and others connected to Zambian Airways, but of course if there was any wrongdoing by the shareholders, directors, managers and staff of Zambian Airways, the law must take its course. If at the same time, this was a normal business practice gone wrong, Development Bank of Zambia and other lenders have recourse to seizing assets of the airlines to recover their money.

…..

A few days ago, I cam across an article quoting Forum for Development Search chairperson Edwin Lifwekelo calling for non-performing MPs to step down and it is obvious that this follows a demonstration by MMD cadres against Kabwata Member of Parliament Given Lubinda for his alleged failure to “take” development to his constituency.

I wonder if Lifwekelo implies that MPs should take over the overall development of their constituencies particularly with the K400 million Constituency Development Funds (CDFs) while local authorities and government go to sleep. MPs and councillors can only serve as a conveyor belt for development ideas while local authorities do the rest.

The problem in Zambia is that issues of development are not taken seriously such that town planning is done haphazardly such that anybody is able to put up a structure anywhere and at the end of the day, those structures are legitimized and the MP is under pressure to provide roads, water, electricity and other facilities.

The practice in other parts of the world is that when there is an upcoming development project in a locality, the residents are consulted through notices that are put up in strategic public places and local newspapers so that those with contrary views are also heard.

If the majority of the people are not happy with the project, it is then shelved. If, on the other hand, the residents nod to the project, everyone involved is under pressure to deliver on it. MPs and councillors are in constant consultation with government, local authorities and the residents as stakeholders.

In our case, we lost it when party cadres and other crooked officials started allocating land even in protected areas such that even school fields, cemeteries and game reserves have not been spared from unplanned land allocations and unregulated structures.

Lubinda has been Kabwata MP for a long time now and it is surprising that he has only been labelled as non-performing simply because he is a pain in the side of government and the MMD by his vigilance in a number of areas.