...As his legacy comes under spotlight in Zambia
Cecil John Rhodes, no doubt, played a very big role in the establishment of the country now called Zambia when his British South African Company (BSAC) set up administrative centres in North-western Rhodesia as well as North-eastern Rhodesia which later merged to form what became known as Northern Rhodesia up to 1964 when it changed to its current name.
Events in South Africa in the last few weeks first calling
for the removal of Rhodes’ statue from the University of Cape Town campus
grounds and then removing it altogether, has brought about debate in countries
associated with Rhodes—Zimbabwe and Zambia.
As for Zimbabwe, President Robert Mugabe stated his position
regarding the man who gave the two neighbouring countries—Zambia and
Zimbabwe—their colonial names, Southern Rhodesia and Northern Rhodesia,
respectively.
President Mugabe, during a recent state visit to South
Africa, pointed out that his country’s southern neighbour had the colonialist’s
statue, but Zimbabwe has his remains, buried in the Matopos, a range of hills
in the south west of Zimbabwe, a country that had carried the man’s name until
1980. Rhodes died in 1902.
Mugabe, dismissing the thought that the man who paved the
way for the colonisation of a large part of Southern Africa through his
Cape-To-Cairo railway dream as part of accessing Africa’s rich and vast mineral resources, said Zimbabwe would not exhume Rhodes' remains even as some people were calling for such action.
Quoted by Nehanda Radio, Mugabe said: “We in Zimbabwe had forgotten about Cecil Rhodes until South
Africa said it has his statue in Cape Town, where he was the minister of the
Cape and mischievously wanted to also take control of Zimbabwe… We have his corpse,
you can keep his statue.” Rhodes' grave in the Matopos. |
Zambia, the other Rhodesia, does not escape Rhodes’ presence
in one way or the other. A Lusaka upmarket leafy suburb is named after him.
This is Rhodes Park situated very close to the central business district (CBD).
Ironically, Rhodes Park also bears a local vernacular name—Maluba, flower for
those who may not know Nyanja.
Rhodes may not have set foot in Northern Rhodesia now Zambia
but people sent by him were all over the place seeking often fraudulent and
misleading concessions with local kings and sub-kings that opened up most of the
country with mining as the major economic activity which was enhanced by
construction of a railway line from Livingstone to Chililabombwe.
Sir Evelyn Hone's Statue
With the events down south, the issue has undoubtedly brought about debate about keeping Rhodes and other colonialists’ legacies. University of Zambia political scientist Dr Alex Ng’oma kicked-started the debate when he called authorities at one of Zambia’s top colleges, the Evelyn Hone College, to pull down the statue of the man it is named after, Sir Evelyn Hone, who was the last colonial governor of Northern Rhodesia
Media trainer, Herbert Macha, however, denounced the
uprooting of statues. In a Facebook post, he said:
“Hate him or like him, Cecil Rhodes contributed immensely to
development of Southern Africa, buried in Matebeleland in Zimbabwe, his
investments are still present. I feel sorry [for] our brothers and sisters in
South Africa for they may not know well the history.”
On the same Facebook wall, Mweete Hamakwenda posted:
“It's a misplaced fight. Fighting
CJR [Cecil John Rhodes] statue while failing to fight the principles he
represented, which still exist through the imperialist policies of Britain, USA
etc. Who determines the price of copper at the global market? Who decides the
quantities of exports the third world can trade in the developed world? Who
controls global affairs through the undemocratic Security Council and G7? Who
controls or fixes oil prices when this high-value product is in bulk in Africa
and can change the continents' economic profile if trade was fair? So, why go
and exhume a dinosaur from his grave when you are failing to deal with his
living principles in today's global economy. Stupid Africa at it again!”
My contribution on the same wall
was:
“… As we teach history let it not
be the account of the hunter at the expense of the lion, i.e the conquerors
writing the history rather than the conquered. Let us tell the story that
Leander Starr Jameson [leader of the BSAC pioneer column] who gave us the name
Fort Jameson, hanged [Ngoni] Prince Nsingu! Let us teach our children that Dr [David] Livingstone was a ruthless
itinerant whose mission was not to spread Christianity but to pave way for the
[1885] Berlin Conference. The history we are taught--even our own independence
struggle history--is full of nothing but half-truths and outright lies. Ok,
pulling down statues is not the panacea, it is rewriting the curriculum to
reflect nothing but the truth [that needs to be done]”
In any case, whatever is done
with Rhodes’ statues and his legacy in the Southern African region, the truth
of the matter is that he changed the boundaries, familial and inter-ethnic
relations and cultures through movement of peoples who were forced to pay taxes
which could only be done through work in new labour endeavours he controlled
and the state administration that was born out of the new economic activity
centres arose.
[Photo credit: Wikipedia]
[Photo credit: Wikipedia]
1 comment:
Hi Gershom,
thanks for sharing your blog. I found it very interesting. Reading it has left mixed feelings in my heart, among which are anger, resentment and may be a little sense of depression.
I am angry because of the way Livingstone has been represented. While what you say about him paving a way for the 1885 Berlin Conference might be true, I desist from spreading such rumors unless there is tangible proof. We are dealing with a historical moment, the best we can do is to educate our children about truths and untruths or is it miss-truths?
I am resentful about the fact that we are here again wrestling history to such an extent that it is becoming a continental debate. What developmental issues could we make debatable and benefit young people? Nothing wrong with debating issues like these but we have to make them productive. What is the end?
I am a little depressed because we are still pawns in the hands of greedy imperialists and we still seem to be playing victim. The imperialists are greedy, but how un-greedy are we?
Thanks Gershom for the history buff you are, I really respect your provocative topics. On the other hand, there are some religious issues that we may have to sound off on sometime in future when time allows.
Post a Comment